Legal Opinion
Enpalm, Lcc v. Teitler Family Trust
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 30, 2008No. B194372PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUBIN, J.
Defendants Tracy P. Teitler, Teitler Investments, and the Teitler Family Trust appeal from the order reducing their award of contractual attorney fees after they were awarded judgment in a real estate fraud and breach of contract action. We hold that the trial court properly applied equitable principles to reduce the fee award and therefore affirm the order.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY1
In December 2003, Ezri Namvar bought a Beverly Hills apartment building owned by the Teitler Family Trust (the Trust). Namvar was a principal of EnPalm, LLC, and he soon after assigned his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Graciano v. Robinson Ford Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Plotnik v. MeihausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Dailey v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Frog Creek Partners, LLC v. Vance Brown, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Concepcion v. Amscan Holdings, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.