Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Wittinger

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 2004No. 20040051PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Alfred Wittinger appealed from a judgment ordering a partition sale of farmland and awarding compensatory damages to Donald and Kenneth Wittinger. We hold the trial court’s finding that a partition in kind could not be made without great prejudice to the co-owners is not clearly erroneous, and we affirm the partition sale of the property. We also hold that the court’s award of compensatory damages for loss of federal program payments is not supported by the record evidence, and we therefore reverse that part of the compensatory damages award to Donald and Kenneth…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schnell v. SchnellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Peters-Riemers v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Schneider v. SchaafNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. McKechnie v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Treiber v. Citizens State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of LoomerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. City of Harwood v. The City of Reiles AcresNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. OstbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Beach Railport, LLC v. MichelsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. CTC East, LLC v. Steven Goldstein and Barry N. LipsyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API