McKechnie v. Berg
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Brad N. Berg appealed from a judgment in a partition action dividing the real and personal property he and Kim McKechnie accumulated during their 14-year unmarried cohabitation. We conclude the trial court did not misapply the law, its findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, and the findings support an equal partition of the parties’ real and personal property. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] During the summer of 1987, Berg moved into McKechnie’s trader home in Westhope and began living there with McKechnie and her daughter. At the time Berg moved into the trailer, he owned very…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cermak v. CermakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- McDowell v. McDowellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Bagan v. BaganNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re Estate of EriksenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Schnell v. SchnellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Amsbaugh v. AmsbaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Blumenthal v. BrewerIllinois Supreme Court · 2017
- Red River Wings, Inc. v. Hoot, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. CauserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. CainNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.