Legal Opinion
Sportsmen for I-143 v. Montana Fifteenth Judicial District Court
Montana Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 2002No. 01-859PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
¶1 Sportsmen For I-143 and Montana Wildlife Federation (the Sportsmen’s Groups) have filed an application for writ of supervisory control. The Sportsmen’s Groups request that this Court exercise supervisory control by ordering the Fifteenth Judicial District Court to permit them to intervene in an action challenging the enforcement of ballot Initiative 143. On December 18, 2001, the Court granted a stay of the District Court proceedings and ordered Respondent to respond to the Sportsmen’s Groups’ application. In its brief, Respondent contends that this case is not an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Michigan State Afl-Cio v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Sagebrush Rebellion, Inc. v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Coalition of Arizona/New Mexico Counties for Stable Economic Growth v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Plumb v. Fourth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Perry v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- League of Women Voters Minnesota v. RitchieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Spoklie v. DEPT. OF FISH, WILDLIFE & PARKSMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Driver v. Sentence Review Division in Supreme CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.