Legal Opinion

Driver v. Sentence Review Division in Supreme Court

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 2010No. OP 09-0609PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Petitioners filed a motion with the Sentence Review Division (Division) seeking clarification of the standard of review to be applied to criminal sentences submitted to the Division for review. The Division denied the Petitioners’ motion, holding that the “clearly inadequate or excessive” standard under Rule 17, Mont. Sent. Rev. Div., correctly stated the appropriate standard of review. Petitioners then filed a Petition for Writ of Supervisory Control with this Court, asserting the Division was proceeding under a mistake of law.

¶2 We state the issues as follows:

¶3 1. Is the exercise of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. HerdMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Park v. Montana Sixth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. CollierMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. MaldonadoMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Ranta v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WhalenMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. MorrisMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. J. LafieldMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Avery v. BatistaMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. R. OttoMontana Supreme Court · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API