Green Ex Rel. Green v. Green
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
Plaintiff’s appeal challenges the correctness of the ruling of the court below upon two points:
1. Can an infant maintain an action against ber father for support?
2. And, if so, may she haye an allowance for counsel fees ?
The first question must be answered “Tes” and tbe second “No.”
1. It is held in Lynn Sanders and J. D. Sanders, by Their Next Friend, W. J. Pratt, v. R. M. Sanders, 161 N. C., 319: “There can be no controversy that the father is under a legal as well as a moral duty to support his infant children (Walker v. Crowder, 37 N. C., 487), and, if he has the ability to do so, whether…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
- Roller v. RollerWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Small Ex Rel. Balthis v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Wick v. WickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Medlin v. . MedlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Goodyear v. GoodyearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Wells v. . WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Wells v. WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Redding Ex Rel. Redding v. ReddingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.