Legal Opinion

Redding Ex Rel. Redding v. Redding

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1952No. 672PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenNy, J.

The common law does not recognize the right of an un-emancipated minor child, living in the household of its parents, to maintain an action in tort against its parents or either of them. The common law in this respect was enunciated and adhered to in Small v. Morrison, 185 N.C. 577, 118 S.E. 12, 31 A.L.R. 1135.

It is not contended by the appellant that there is any difference in the factual situation in the present appeal and that presented and adjudicated in Small v. Morrison, supra. It is contended, however, that the time has come when the harshness of the common law, as enunciated in that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Small Ex Rel. Balthis v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. State v. . HamptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Wright Ex Rel. Wright v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Henson v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. State v. . BatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Nudd v. MatsoukasIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gillikin v. BurbageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Borst v. BorstWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Downs v. PoulinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
  5. Rutkowski v. WaskoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API