Legal Opinion
Arado v. Keitel
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided July 3, 1944No. 38964PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Action by plaintiffs (respondents) to review a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Commission of Missouri holding that, under the provisions of Section 9427, R.S. 1939, as amended, Laws of Missouri 1941, pp. 592-7, Mo. R.S.A., sec. 9427, a successor employing unit (partnership composed of respondents, John Arado, Otto Burk and Louis Puricelli), upon acquiring a business, does not stand in the position (in the respects mentioned in the Section as amended) of the predecessor employing unit, a partnership composed of Philip Darsch, John Arado and Otto Burk. The trial court reversed the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schneider v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Texas Unemployment Compensation Commission v. BassTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Kellogg v. MurphySupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- Murphy v. Doniphan Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Krisman v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Martin v. YeohamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Darrell D. Parks, Carl T. Ramsey and Phillips Petroleum Company, a Corporation v. Riverside Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Elzea v. HammackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
- Bucklin Coal Mining Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.