Legal Opinion

Elzea v. Hammack

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1951PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

In this case, plaintiffs, John E. Elzea, Ruth H. Elzea, lone A. Elzea, and Louis E. Elzea, sued defendants, John T. Hammack and the Dimmitt-Rickhoff-Bayer Real Estate Company, Inc., a corporation, for damages for fraud and deceit in the sale of a parcel of real estate. The defendants answered, thus putting the case at issue. The defendant Dimmitt-Rickhoff-Bayer Real Estate Company, Inc., as a part of its answer, filed a third-party petition against John T. Hammack, Harry T. Weeks, Dayton F. Hyde, and Sullivan S. Mars-den, in which said third-party petition plaintiff (Dimmitt-RickhoffBayer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Algiere v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Arado v. KeitelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Crouch v. TourtelotSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  3. Putnam v. DeRosaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. SSM Health Care St. Louis v. Radiologic Imaging Consultants, LLPMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Jones v. KinneyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API