Legal Opinion

Martin v. Yeoham

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1967No. 24527, 24526PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROSS, Judge.

On July 20, 1963, plaintiff Irven Lee Martin, III received a bullet wound from a revolver fired by defendant Carl J. Yeo-ham. Thereafter plaintiff filed this action for personal injury damages against three defendants, to-wit: Carl J. Yeoham, his wife, Mary Yeoham, and David Markowitz. Plaintiff undertook to recover damages from defendant Carl J. Yeoham on the ground that he was negligent in firing the weapon and inflicting the wound, and from defendants Mary Yeoham and David Mar-kowitz on the theory they were partners of defendant Carl J. Yeoham as owners and operators of a…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Heizer v. Kingsland & Douglass Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Raming v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  3. Birmingham Mineral Railroad v. JacobsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Scott v. Missouri InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  5. Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co. v. Thomas Grain Fumigant Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Ten Broeck Dupont, Inc. v. BrooksKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  3. United National Ins. Co. v. The Tunnel, Inc. v. Jeffrey BernsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. Bridgeforth v. ProffittMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Sheehan v. SheehanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API