Nelson v. City of Lake Oswego
Court of Appeals of Oregon
(Cases Consolidated for Opinion Only)
1Opinion of the Court
*418WARREN, J.
Plaintiffs Nelson applied to defendant city for a permit to construct a house. In reviewing the application, city personnel found a problem with the property description and informed plaintiffs that a permit could be granted only if they applied for and obtained a lot line adjustment between their property and their neighbors’, the Reises.1 Plaintiffs and the Reises applied for the adjustment, and the city manager allowed it, subject to the requirement that the applicants execute “nonremonstrance” agreements, pledging that they would not oppose future street improvements or the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Suess Builders Co. v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of Pompano Beach v. Yardarm Restaurant, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- West Linn Corporate Park LLC v. City of West LinnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Curran v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- West Linn Corporate Park, L.L.C. v. City of West LinnOregon Supreme Court · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.