Legal Opinion

Rawls v. . Bennett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1942PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The criminal prosecution of which the plaintiff here complains was the result of admissions made by the plaintiff in the civil action brought against him for an accounting in his capacity as manager, secretary and treasurer of Rawls Motor Sales and Service, Inc. The defendant, her counsel, the solicitor and the grand jury all acted upon the adverse examination in that suit. It afforded a reasonable ground for one of ordinary caution “to believe, or to entertain an honest and strong suspicion,” that the plaintiff was guilty. Stacey v. Emery, 97 U. S., 642. In a very real sense, then, it may be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stacey v. EmerySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Dickerson v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Morgan v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Wilkinson v. . WilkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Smith v. . DeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1857

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carson v. DoggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Melton v. RickmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Truman v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New YorkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Melton v. . RickmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Taylor v. . HodgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API