Legal Opinion

Gray v. Deal

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 6, 1915No. 4592PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from District Court, Osage County; Paul B. Mason, Special Judge. Action by F. W. Gray against Julia A. Deal and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

■ Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This action was commenced in the trial court by the plaintiff in error, seeking to enforce a judgment lien against the homestead of Julia A. and George Deal; after it had been conveyed and was held by the vendee. The defendant in error, F. D. Foutz, by answer and cross-petition also seeks to enforce a judgment lien against the surplus allotment of Julia A. Deal. There was a trial to the court and judgment for the defendants, denying the lien claimed by the plaintiff, as well as that claimed by the defendant Foutz. To review that judgment the cause has been brought…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morris v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1869
  2. Hoyt v. HoweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Hansen v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Folsom v. CarliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
  5. Neilson v. AlbertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McCart v. Jordana (In Re Jordana)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. Finerty v. First Nat. Bank of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Burrows v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Thorsby v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Field v. GoatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API