Legal Opinion

Dedenbach v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1906No. Docket No. 143PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Appoline Dedenbach against the city of Detroit for personal injuries. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the- court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The appellant was plaintiff in a negligence case commenced against the city of Detroit by sum*711mons issued November 15, 1904, said to have been served the same day upon the city controller, but not by an officer; it appearing that the writ was not placed in the hands of an officer until December 3, 1904. Upon that day the officer served it upon the city clerk. The injury complained of occurred on November 16, 1903. The plea was the general issue, with notice that the action was not commenced within one year from the time when the injury was received, as required by section 279 of the charter of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peck v. German Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Harvey v. Detroit Fire & Marine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. International Paper Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Guastello v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Taylor v. MathewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Fulton v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People ex rel. McCallum v. GebhardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API