Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne; Carpenter,, J. Assumpsit by Fred C. Harvey against the Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance Company on a policy of insurance. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment obtained against it by the plaintiff upon an insurance policy issued by defendant. The plaintiff, who resides in Detroit, was the owner of the schooner Penokee, which had a valuation, stated in the policies hereafter mentioned, of $4,050. The plaintiff, applied to defendant for insurance. Policies were delivered to him June 10, *6031896, insuring the body, tackle, apparel, and other furniture of the schooner Penokee in the following amounts, viz.:

Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance Co,, defendant____$1,200

Providence-Washington Insurance…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The " Potomac"Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Steel v. Phenix Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1892
  3. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. JenkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Peck v. German Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Howell v. ShepardMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dedenbach v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Haraburda v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1960
  3. Davis v. BeresMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Porter v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Shepard v. KaylerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API