Legal Opinion

Schnuth v. Harrison

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1969No. 116PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

This is an action seeking rescission of the agreement between the parties by reason of false representations knowingly made by defendant to induce plaintiff to enter into the agreement. On this appeal the issues can be simply stated:

1. Are the findings of the trial court as to the false representations contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence?

2. In an action for rescission can plaintiff recover all the items of damage forming the judgment here?

Although the complaint lists six different misrepresentations which the defendant allegedly made and upon which plaintiff…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. MacaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Kuehn v. KuehnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Stevenson v. BarwineckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Mueller v. MichelsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Neas v. SiemensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Racine v. NotteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Incorporated v. Powersports, Incorporated and Powersports of Seminole County, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. CMFG Life Insurance Company v. RBS Securities, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  4. Seidling v. Unichem, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Head & Seemann, Inc. v. GreggCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API