Legal Opinion
Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Incorporated v. Powersports, Incorporated and Powersports of Seminole County, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 21, 2003No. 02-2095PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
In this diversity action, Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. (“Harley-Davidson”) alleged that PowerSports Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary PowerSports of Seminole County, Inc. (collectively “Pow-erSports”) had made fraudulent misrepresentations in order to obtain Harley-Davidson’s approval of a transfer of a Harley-Davidson dealership to PowerSports. Harley-Davidson sought rescission of that approval. In granting summary judgment for PowerSports, the district court held that, even though Harley-Davidson was seeking the equitable remedy of rescission rather than tort…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Smith v. SevernCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Huron Tool and Engineering Co. v. Precision Consulting Services, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Richard Thomas, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Chyrl Thomas v. Christ Hospital and Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Digicorp, Inc. v. AMERITECH CORP.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Wickenhauser v. LehtinenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- CMFG Life Insurance Company v. RBS Securities, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.