Legal Opinion
Stevenson v. Barwineck
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 1, 1959PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
In order for appellants to have been entitled to summary judgment, the evidentiary facts set out in their affidavits must have established a defense sufficient to defeat the plaintiffs. Sec. 270.635 (2), Stats.
Appellants state the question involved on this appeal as follows:
“Is an agent liable and responsible in damages to a third party for the innocent repetition by him of information furnished the agent by his principal, and which was honestly believed by the agent, and wherein the agent had no basis to doubt the verity of the same, which information actually was a misrepresentation by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gunther v. UllrichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- First National Bank of Tigerton v. HackettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Palmer v. GoldbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Smith v. BadlamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- Lee v. BielefeldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by33 opinions
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Badger Pharmacal, Inc., D/B/A Wisconsin Pharmacal Company, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive Company and Softsoap Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Grube v. DaunCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- Whipp v. IversonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.