Legal Opinion

Estate of Sheid

California Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1900No. L.A. No. 870PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The -facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

This is an appeal by the contestants, claiming to be heirs of said deceased, from an order and decree of distribution distributing the whole of the residue of said estate to respondent Mary T. Wall, and also from an order denying the motion of said contestants for a new trial in said matter.

W. T. Sheid died intestate March 9, 1896, in San Luis Obispo county, leaving an estate therein consisting of real and personal property. One Laeefield was appointed administrator of said estate March 25, 1896, and on May 2, 1896, notice to creditors was given. April 3, 1897, said administrator filed his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clay v. WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Lewis v. CovillaudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Freeman v. GlessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Steinberger v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Lockwood v. FlemingMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Duncan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API