Clay v. Wall
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from a decree of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County distributing the estate of a deceased person. E. P. Hnangst, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
Respondent, Mary T. Wall, filed her petition asking that said estate (consisting principally of real estate, of which there were several parcels) be distributed -to her as the sole heir of said decedent, who died intestate. Appellants contested her heirship and right to distribution. Hpon the hearing, the court made findings of fact and conclusions of law ini her favor, followed by the words: “Let distribution of said estate be made accordingly.” Before the entry of any order or decree thereon the first of these appeals (Ho. 451) was taken, and respondent contends- that it was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. WesterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Freeman v. GlessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by17 opinions
- Carter v. FrahmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Kimic v. San Jose-Los Gatos Interurban Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Carroll v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Steinberger v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Banfield v. SchuldermanOregon Supreme Court · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.