Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1935No. S. F. 15317; S. F. 15318PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

Petitioners brought two proceedings, one for a writ of mandate and one for a writ of prohibition or supersedeas. Both involve the same parties and the same probate proceeding, and they are therefore considered together.

The decedent, Ernest C. Duncan, died intestate on January 11, 1933. His only heirs at law were his widow, Lucy N. Duncan, who became the administratrix, and his mother, Emma C. Duncan, petitioner herein. The widow claimed the entire estate as community property. Petitioner claimed half of it, contending that it was separate property. On December 1, 1933, the administratrix…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hennessy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Estate of SheidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. California High-Speed Rail Authority v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Estate of MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Lindstrom v. HaglundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API