Legal Opinion

Steinberger v. Ross

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1919No. L. A. No. 5864PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a petition for the final distribution of an estate of a deceased person. James C. Rives, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. H. Merriam, G. Harold Janeway and Hunsaker, Britt & Edwards for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

This is an appeal by one Maggie G. Steinberger from an order made in proceedings for the final distribution of the estate of deceased, denying appellant’s motion for a dismissal of the petition filed therein by one Mary E. Ross, praying that the court proceed in accord with the provisions of section 1664 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to determine who were entitled to succeed to the estate, and denying the application for final distribution presented by the administrator.

On May 9,1917, this court affirmed the judgment in favor of plaintiff in the action of said Maggie G. Steinberger against…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. WesterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. William Hill Co. v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Whalen v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dabney v. PhilleoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Hutchinson v. DowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Pritchard v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. North Laramie Land Co. v. HoffmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API