Legal Opinion
Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Sprowls
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided August 26, 2002No. 2002-SC-0147-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE PURSUANT TO CR 65.09
I. INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to CR 65.09, Oakwood Homes, Inc. (“Oakwood”) and William J. Rotert, Jr. (“Rotert”) (hereinafter collectively “Movants”) ask this Court to vacate a February 18, 2002 order of the Court of Appeals. In the order, the Court of Appeals denied Movants’ CR 65.07 motion seeking relief from the Hardin Circuit Gourt’s order denying Movants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration. We hold that Movants have failed to show extraordinary cause to justify the relief they seek, and we therefore deny Movants’ motion.
II. FACTUAL…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Linda James v. McDonald Corporation, Simon Marketing, Incorporated, and Ante Enterprises Llc, Doing Business as McDonald RestaurantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- North Fork Collieries, LLC v. HallKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Kindred Hospitals Ltd. Partnership v. LutrellKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- William David Ellington v. Harlan Randall BecraftKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.