Legal Opinion

Grant v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 3, 2002No. 00SC799PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

We granted certiorari in People v. Grant, 30 P.3d 667 (Colo.App.2000), to interpret the waiver provision of section 19-2-511, 6 C.R.S. (2001) ("juvenile statements statute").1 Seventeen-year-old Jeron Grant spoke with police about a double homicide while his parents waited in a nearby room. Under the statute, such interview is permissible only when the juvenile and his parents expressly waive in writing the statutory requirement of parental presence. Grant's parent signed a waiver, but Grant did not. The statutory phrase "[this express waiver shall be in writ*545ing" in subsection 19-2-511(5)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Hall v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. Fogg v. MacAlusoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. People v. SwainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. Rodriguez v. SchuttSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Colorado Water Conservation Board v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. Krutsinger v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  3. People Ex Rel. Salazar v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  4. Romero v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  5. Young v. Brighton School District 27JSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API