Thomas v. Fogarty
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Seventh District. To the facts stated by the Court it is necessary to add only that— the Sheriff having adjourned the Court on Saturday, at noon, until the next regular term—on Monday, February tenth, the Court was opened at the usual hour, the District Judge, the Clerk and Sheriff being present.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Seventh District. To the facts stated by the Court it is necessary to add only that— the Sheriff having adjourned the Court on Saturday, at noon, until the next regular term—on Monday, February tenth, the Court was opened at the usual hour, the District Judge, the Clerk and Sheriff being present. The Court thereupon ordered that the minutes of Saturday, February eighth, be amended by striking out the words “ next regular term,” and inserting the words “ Monday next, at ten o’clock, A. M.” On Monday the decree of foreclosure in question was rendered, all parties who had…
1Opinion of the CourtCope, J.
Field, C. J. concurring.
*645This is an appeal from a judgment of foreclosure rendered by the District Court for Napa county. The judgment was rendered on the tenth of February, 1862 ; and the only point made is, that prior to that time the Court was adjourned for the term. The objection is based upon the ninety-fifth section of the Act concerning Courts of Justice and Judicial Officers, and the question is as to the construction of that section. The section reads as follows: “ If no Judge attend on the day appointed for holding the Court before noon, the Sheriff or Clerk shall adjourn the Court…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. HandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- In re TerrillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Loesnitz v. SeelingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- May v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.