Legal Opinion

Loesnitz v. Seelinger

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1890No. 15,133PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Ripley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.

The complaint in this case consists of two paragraphs, to each of which the circuit court sustained a *424demurrer, and thereupon the appellees had judgment for costs. The assignment of error calls in question the correctness of this ruling. Each paragraph seeks to obtain a decree enjoining the collection of an assessment made against the land of the appellant to aid in the construction of a free gravel road, and each proceeds upon the theory that the proceedings of the board of commissioners, resulting in the as-' sessment, are void.

In the first paragraph it is alleged that the board of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Ricketts v. SprakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. White v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Garlick v. DunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
  5. Brumley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1859

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Glenn v. Dallas County Bois D'Arc Island Levee DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Board of Commissioners v. ConnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Gilson v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Chadwick, Treasurer v. City of CrawfordsvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Turner v. ConkeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API