Legal Opinion

Doeden v. Stubstad

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 2008No. 20070322PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Karen Doeden, doing business as High Impact Sign Company or A High Impact Sign, appeals from a judgment dismissing her action against Curtis Stubstad for conversion of property that she claimed belonged to her. We hold the district court’s findings that Doeden did not own the disputed property because she had not been given the property and that Stubstad did not convert the property are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Stanley Knecht owned and operated an unincorporated portable sign rental business, High Impact Sign Company, which generally consisted of about 30…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sathre v. MoodieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  2. In Re Kaspari's EstateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  3. VND, LLC v. Leevers Foods, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Buri v. RamseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Fargo Foods, Inc. v. BernabucciNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Nelson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. HammerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Myaer v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Service Oil, Inc. v. GjestvangNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Hildenbrand v. Capital RV Center, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API