Legal Opinion

State v. Spates

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1992No. 91-984PublishedCited by 219 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

The defendant-appellee argues that the denial of assistance of counsel at the preliminary hearing was prejudicial error and a violation of his constitutional right to counsel at a critical stage of the criminal proceedings.

The plaintiff-appellant, state of Ohio, contends that defendant’s plea of guilty waives his right to appeal his conviction on the ground that he was deprived of counsel at the preliminary hearing.

For the reasons that follow, we hold that defendant waived his right to challenge the denial of his right to counsel at the preliminary hearing, since he entered a plea of guilty…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by219 opinions

  1. State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. FitzpatrickOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. BoshkoOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Ohio v. VinsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

214 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API