Flank Oil Co. v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Company
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle
The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiffs instituted this action pursuant to the Colorado Unfair Practices Act, C.R.S. ’53, 55-2-1, et seq., seeking temporary and permanent injunctive relief against alleged violations of the Act. Following filing of the complaint which named all of the defendant oil companies as defendants, the matter was set for hearing on the several defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint. After a lengthy hearing the trial court determined Section 3 of the Act to be so vague and indefinite that it failed to provide notice of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hygrade Provision Co. v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Hygrade Provision Co., Inc. v. Sherman, Atty. Gen. Of New York Lewis & Fox Co. v. Same. Satz v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Weissman v. Board of Ed. of Jefferson Cty. Sch. Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Baum v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- Howe v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Division of Consumer Protection v. Rio Vista Oil, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- Hartsock-Flesher Candy Co. v. Wheeling Wholesale Grocery Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.