Legal Opinion

Gableman v. Department of Conservation

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1944No. Docket No. 11, Calendar No. 42,652PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiff Charles Gableman is the owner of lot 9 in Sunrise Heights subdivision, Highland township, Oakland county, Michigan, fronting on White lake. He has occupied these premises for some 20 years and has invested upwards of $7,500 in a home thereon. In pursuance of its policy to make the waters of the State available to the public, defendant Department of Conservation purchased four contiguous 50-foot lots in this subdivision, i. e., lots 10, 11, 12 and 13, which immediately adjoin plaintiff’s property. The restrictions of record in this subdivision read substantially as follows:

“Said land…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Attorney General Ex Rel. Director of Conservation v. TaggartMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Briggs v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Smith v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Lansing v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Adair v. BonninghausenMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Buddy v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Plassey v. S. Loewenstein & SonMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Sipes v. McGheeMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Opal Lake Ass'n v. Michaywé Ltd. PartnershipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Rockenbach v. ApostleMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API