Legal Opinion

Egbert v. Nissan North America, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 2007No. 20060433PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

T1 The Federal District Court for the District of Utah has certified to us the following two questions:

1. In a product liability case where a manufacturer's product complies with applicable government safety standards, should the jury be instructed that a presumption of non-defectiveness has arisen under Utah Code Ann. § 78-15-68)? If so, should the instruction require clear and convincing evidence of a defect to rebut the presumption, or is proof by a preponderance of the evidence sufficient for rebuttal?

2, Does Utah recognize the "enhanced injury" theory of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Berry by and Through Berry v. Beech AircraftUtah Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Healthbanc Int'l, LLC v. Synergy Worldwide, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2018
  2. In re Accutane Litig.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
  3. Essential Botanical Farms, LC v. KayUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Niemela v. Imperial Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  5. Garfield Cnty. v. United StatesUtah Supreme Court · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API