Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Kusel
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 29, 1980No. 12995PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Justice.
ACTION
Kayleen Johnson (appellant) appeals from an order of dismissal entered October 25, 1979, by the trial court which granted Brad Kusel’s (appellee’s) motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. As a consequence of this order, appellant’s action alleging paternity on the part of appellee was dismissed. We reverse.
FACTS
Appellant is a resident of Yankton County, South Dakota, and appellee is a resident of Cedar County, Nebraska. On November 15, 1978, appellant filed a complaint with the trial court alleging that she and appel-lee had had sexual intercourse in Yankton…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Matter of HeuermannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Estate of ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Western Surety Co. v. MydlandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Bahlkow v. PrestonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- The Austad Company, a South Dakota Corporation v. Pennie & Edmonds, a New York PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Marilyn M. Marshall v. Mikel WarwickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Donald Bruce Sondergard v. Miles, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Carol M. Sieg v. Keith E. KarnesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- In Re Appeal From the Final Decision of the South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Division, for AdamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.