Legal Opinion
Marilyn M. Marshall v. Mikel Warwick
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 4, 1998No. 97-4022PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.
Marilyn M. Marshall appeals from a final order entered in the United States District Court 1 for the District of South Dakota dismissing her tort action against Mikel Warwick for insufficient service of process. Marshall v. Warwick, No. CIV 97-3002 (D.S.D. Oct. 23, 1997) (Order) (hereinafter “slip op”). For reversal, Marshall argues that the district court erred in granting Warwick’s motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5) because (1) Warwick’s actual notice of the impending lawsuit together with Marshall’s substantial…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Umbenhauer v. WoogCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Colleton Preparatory Academy, Inc. v. Hoover Universal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- In Re Focus Media Inc., Debtor, Thomas E. Rubin v. John P. Pringle, Chapter 7 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Wallace v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Clifton Whidbee v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Wasson v. Riverside CountyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.