Legal Opinion
The Austad Company, a South Dakota Corporation v. Pennie & Edmonds, a New York Partnership
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 9, 1987No. 86-5306PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.
The Austad Company (Austad), a South Dakota corporation, appeals from a final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the District of South Dakota dismissing its complaint against Pennie & Edmonds, a New York partnership, for lack of personal jurisdiction. For reversal Austad argues that the district court had jurisdiction over Pennie & Edmonds under the South Dakota long-arm statute. S.D. Codified Laws Ann. 15-7-2 (1984). For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the order of the district court.
Pennie & Edmonds, a law firm, specializes in patent litigation. Its…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Arthur F. Sawtelle, Etc. v. George E. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Dakota Industries, Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Wien Air Alaska, Inc. v. BrandtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Newsome v. GallacherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Bell Paper Box, Inc. v. U.S. Kids, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.