Legal Opinion
Taliaferro v. Riddle
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 4, 1959No. Civ. 17907PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
Plaintiff appeals from an order of April 1, 1957, which quashed service of an alias summons and amended complaint upon defendants Valentine K. and Elsie M. Hartman. These defendants had been served on March 9 and March 28, 1957, pursuant to an order of June 18, 1954, which directed the joining of the Hartmans as necessary parties defendant.
The notice of motion specified two grounds only: (1) On June 14, 1954, an order was made dismissing this action as to the Hartmans, and (2) they were not served within three years after the commencement of the action.
Neither of these…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gonsalves v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Brock v. FouchyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Jackson v. LacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Hernandez v. National Dairy Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Nelson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Warren v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- California Water Service Co. v. Edward Sidebotham & Son, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Dresser v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Watson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.