Nelson v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDANIEL, J.
Kenneth Draper Nelson (plaintiff) appeals from the order and judgment dismissing defendants Harvey E. Billig, M.D., Paul Cress, M.D., Terrill R. Holland, Ph.D, Lindberg Hale, and 30 fictitious Doe defendants, and from the judgment following the order which sustained the State of California’s demurrer to plaintiff’s first amended complaint. The questions on appeal are: (1) when does the time run for service on defendants originally named as Does but whose true names are later added by amendment; and (2) was plaintiff’s first amended complaint fatally inconsistent with either…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Reichert v. General Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Tresway Aero, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Hocharian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Connelly v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Shane Horton v. City of Santa MariaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Stockett v. Association of California Water Agencies Joint Powers Insurance AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Castaneda v. Department of Corrections & RehabilationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Scalia v. Cnty. of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Smith v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.