Legal Opinion
California Water Service Co. v. Edward Sidebotham & Son, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 17, 1964No. Civ. 21155; Civ. 21156PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
By stipulation, consolidated appeals have been taken by two of the defendants in this action: the first [No. 21156] by the City of Hawthorne and Edward Sidebotham & Son, Inc. (hereafter referred to as Sidebotham) from a judgment determining the ground water rights of the parties; the second [No. 21155] by Sidebotham from an order denying its motions to vacate the judgment.
In 1945, the plaintiffs, the California Water Service and Palos Verdes Water Companies and the City of Torrance, three of the producers of water from a 101,000-acre alluvial filled basin of ground water in West Los Angeles…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Santa Maria v. AdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- City of Barstow v. Mojave Water AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Aldrich v. San Fernando Valley Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Tehachapi-Cummings County Water District v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.