Legal Opinion
State v. Lemler
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 16, 2009No. 24815PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZINTER, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Probationer Neal J. Lemler’s alcohol monitoring bracelet registered three “drinking events,” and the State petitioned to revoke his probation. At the probation violation hearing, the circuit court ruled the State’s expert was qualified to testify concerning transdermal alcohol detection. At the end of the evidentiary hearing, the court ruled the methodology utilized in the alcohol monitoring bracelet met the Dau- bert standard for admissibility of scientific evidence. After considering conflicting expert opinions whether certain variables could have affected the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
- United States v. Demareo Lamont Davis, United States of America v. Dwayne Buford ReedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Thurman v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. HuberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. FisherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. KvasnickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. KvasnickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.