Byrd v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
On this appeal from his convictions for kidnapping, assault with a dangerous weapon (gasoline), and arson, appellant contends chiefly that the trial judge erred in not submitting to the jury the issue of whether he stood in loco parentis to the children he was charged with kidnapping, thus depriving him of a defense afforded by the statute. 1 The meaning of “parent” as used in the kidnapping statute is a novel issue in this jurisdiction. We hold, in keeping with decisions interpreting the identical exception in the federal kidnapping statute, that a step-parent acting…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Pope v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gooch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Simms v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Lewis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Henderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014
- Hudson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. CheckettsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999