Legal Opinion

People v. Checketts

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1999No. E022643PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

Defendant Paul George Checketts appeals his conviction under Penal Code section 2361 for false imprisonment of his daughter A. He contends that, as a matter of law, he cannot be convicted of false imprisonment of his child because, as a parent, he has a right to detain his child at a particular location for any reason. He further contends that the trial court erred by failing to sua sponte instruct the jury that a parent may detain or restrain his child if it does not result in direct injury or harm to the child.

We hold that a parent is not immune from criminal prosecution…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. SiemerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  3. In Re Edward C.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. State v. ViramontesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. LaFleur v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Dick v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Nixon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. Corsen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. Dick v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API