Legal Opinion
Hudson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 17, 2002No. 96-CF-558, 98-CO-608PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge.
Before us is a combined direct appeal from appellant’s convictions for malicious disfigurement while armed (D.C.Code §§ 22-406, -4502) (2001) and aggravated assault while armed (D.C.Code §§ 22-404.1, -4502), and an appeal from the denial of his post-conviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. See D.C.Code § 23-110 (2001). In the direct appeal, we affirm the judgment except that we remand for the trial court to vacate the aggravated assault conviction on grounds of merger. Regarding the collateral attack, however, we vacate the order denying the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Carella v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Swinton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Beaner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Jenkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Burton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Covington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022