Legal Opinion

State v. Bozelko

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 15, 2017No. AC39466PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.

This case returns to this court following our reversal of the trial court's ruling 1 that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the defendant's motion to correct an illegal sentence, and the resulting remand to the trial court, Arnold, J. , for further proceedings on the merits of the defendant's motion. State v. Bozelko , 154 Conn.App. 750 , 766, 108 A.3d 262 (2015). The defendant claimed that the sentencing court, Cronan, J. , sentenced her in an illegal manner by relying on misleading or inaccurate information set forth in her presentence investigation report (PSI). Id., at 763-64,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. State v. KoslikConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. State v. BozelkoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. HPT v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Antwon W.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. State v. PetitpasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  3. State v. FrancisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  4. State v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
  5. State v. BozelkoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API