Legal Opinion

Hensley v. Conard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 13, 1924No. 14589PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, O.

The petition in error in this case contains 12 assignments, only three of which are presented and argued in the brief, and in the view taken of this case here it will only be necessary to consider the first assignment of error, which reads:

“Said court erred in overruling the motion of plaintiffs in error to vacate, set aside and hold for naught the judgment rendered in said cause and to grant plaintiff in error a new trial.”

By their answer defendants presented to the trial court the defense of res adjudicata, and by the reply plaintiffs denied such allegation of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cressler v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Johnson v. GillettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Thigpen v. DeutschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Deming Inv. Co. v. ShannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Comanche Ice Fuel Co. v. Binder HillerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vacuum Oil Co. v. BrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Render v. Capitol Hill Undertaking Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Debose v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Vacuum Oil Co. v. BrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Gary Realty Co. v. SwinneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API