Legal Opinion

Vacuum Oil Co. v. Brett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 21, 1931No. 19416PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

The plaintiff in error instituted a suit in the district court of Osage county against the defendant in error and Orville H. Parker and Paul Parker. The action was to recover on a series of promissory notes signed by the two Parkers and on a .written contract of guaranty signed by the defendant in error. The parties herein will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff and defendant.

The defendant filed a verified general denial. In due course the cause was called for trial, the defendants therein defaulted, and judgment was rendered for the plaintiff on the 26th day of November, 1924, against…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Brown v. TrentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Laithe v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  4. Wolf v. GillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Tiger v. DrumrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Tippins v. TurbenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Nichols v. BonaparteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Stout v. DerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Cavender v. Wofford Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Firemen's Fund Insurance v. GriffinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API