Legal Opinion

Render v. Capitol Hill Undertaking Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 21, 1936No. 25351PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBusbt, J.

In the case of Capitol Hill Undertaking Co. v. Render, 149 Okla. 132, 299 P. 854, this court reversed a judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county, and, upon review of the evidence, remanded the cause to the trial court, with directions to dismiss the action. Our decision became final, a mandate was issued and judgment of the trial court was entered in accord with the announced judgment of this court.

J. T. Render, plaintiff in that case, then filed a petition in the district court seeking to vacate the judgment under the provisions of the fourth subdivision of section 810, C. O. S.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. El Reno Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Vacuum Oil Co. v. BrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Cochran v. BarkusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Steil v. LeverettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Capitol Hill Undertaking Co. v. RenderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davison v. Mutual Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Kelly v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API