Legal Opinion

Vacuum Oil Co. v. Brett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 16, 1930No. 19416PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TEEHEE, C.

The general question- to be determined in this cause is whether or not the trial court in vacating a default judgment, after the term at which it was rendered, abused its discretion.

The case is this': On January 29, 1924, the Vacuum Oil Company, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, brought suit in the district court o-f Osage county against Orville H. Parker and Paul Parker, doing business as the Parker Motor Company at Shidler, to recover of them the sum of $2,445.76, on their promissory notes given in settlement of an account for merchandise sold to them by plaintiff.

In .-the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Laithe v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. Electric Plaster Co. v. Blue Rapids City TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. El Reno Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Thigpen v. DeutschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Clinton v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Riley v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API