Preston National Bank v. Pierson
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Genesee; Smith (George W.), J., presiding. Bill by the Preston National Bank of Detroit against Herman L. Pierson and Mary E. Pierson in aid of execution. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is a bill filed in aid of execution. The defendant Herman L. Pierson was president of the Thread Flouring-Mills Company, and owner of one-fourth of its stock. On the 10th of November, 1892, the milling company made its note for $10,000, due in six months, which note was indorsed by defendant Herman L. Pierson and discounted by complainant. When this note became due it remained unpaid for some 30 days, when $1,000 was paid upon it, and new notes were given for $5,000 and $4,000, respectively. After the maturity of these notes, another $1,000 was paid, and two notes, each in the sum of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. SheldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- McLaughlin v. Bank of PotomacSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Moore v. SpenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
- Boxheimer v. GunnMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Childs v. PellettMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Molsons Bank v. BermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Brydges v. EmmendorferMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
- Stevens v. McLachlanMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Allen v. HillmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Smead v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1899