Smead v. Rogers
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Lenawee; Chester, J. Bill by George A. Smead against Charles E. Rogers, Roye M. Rogers, and Emma L. Rogers in aid of execution. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is a bill filed in aid of execution at law. Prior to the 23d day of January, 1893, Charles E. and Emma L. Rogers were owners, as tenants of the entirety, of an undivided half of the property in question, which consists of a canning plant and machinery in the village of Blissfield, under a conveyance of record. Albert S. Bush and wife were the owners of the other moiety. Mr. Rogers and Mr. Bush were engaged in the business of canning fruits and vegetables. On the date above stated, Bush and wife conveyed the undivided half of the premises to Roye M. Rogers, the son of Charles E. and Emma…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Preston National Bank v. PiersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Township of Maple Valley v. FoleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Barkworth v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Ryan v. MeyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by1 opinion
- L. Starks Co. v. EppinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1915