Legal Opinion

Childs v. Pellett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1894PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Genesee. (Moore, J., presiding.) Bill for tbe dissolution of a partnership, an accounting, ¡the appointment of a receiver, and tbe cancellation of certain mortgages. Defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Prior to the year 1880, defendant William B. Pellett was the owner of a sash and blind factory, in which he carried on business in the city of Flint. In January, 1881, his brother, John J. Pellett, engaged with him in the business, putting in additional capital, and receiving from William B. Pellett a deed of an undivided one-half of the real estate. In 1887 these parties arranged with the complainant, Childs, to become a member of the-firm. He was to put in $5,000 in cash against the property of the firm then known as William B. Pellett & Co., the new firm to assume outstanding obligations,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. SheldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Wales v. NewbouldMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Payne v. AveryMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Snook v. PearsallMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Woodruff v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. Detroit Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Jones v. TurnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Molsons Bank v. BermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Citizens' Commercial & Savings Bank v. PlattMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Preston National Bank v. PiersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API