Legal Opinion

Huihui v. Shimoda

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1982No. 8563PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, J.

A petition for a writ of habeas corpus presents us, for the first time, with the question of the constitutionality of HRS § 804-3(b)(3) (Supp. 1981), pursuant to which an accused must be denied bail if he is charged with a serious crime for which the proof is evident and the presumption great, where he is already free on bail on a felony-charge. The petitioner initially argues that the trial judge erred in finding the proof evident and presumption great that petitioner committed the crimes for which he was charged, and additionally seeks our examination of the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Vlandis v. KlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Carlson v. LandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Baehr v. LewinHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Pele Defense Fund v. PatyHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. MoriwakeHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. KamHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Convention Center Authority v. AnzaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API